August 2007

E-Newsletter

 

Bookstore & Publishing

Christian titles

Self-publishing titles

Copyediting & MSS services

Reviews of Prophecy Titles

Author Columns & Movie Reviews

Everyday Evangelist Column

Talkin' Rapture Column 

Movie Reviews

E-Newsletter Archive

ABout Us

Contact Us

What We Believe

View Our Site Feedback

Miscellaneous

Additional Prewrath Resources

Recommended Prewrath Reading

Recommended Apologetics Reading

Take the Pretrib Test

 

Welcome to the August, 2007, edition of Strong Tower Publishing's e-newsletter.

IN THIS ISSUE:

* New Prewrath Church Added to the List
* Is the Day of the Lord 12 Hours?
* Responses to Reader Questions
* “Going to Zero Inventory” Sale: 50% Off Selected Titles


NEW PREWRATH CHURCH ADDED TO OUR LIST:

Thanks for continuing to provide us with new “prewrath-friendly” and prewrath-teaching churches for our running list found at www.strongtowerpublishing.com/prewrath_churches.htm. We now have listings in 13 states, including Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Mississippi, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, and Washington. We even have one listing in India!

Please keep those church listings coming.

Pastor H. Frederick Drye
New Life Alliance Church
PO Box 1155
3529 High Street
Logansport, IN 46947
Website: www.newlifealliance.net


IS THE DAY OF THE LORD 12 HOURS?

Every now and then, we'll hear people argue that the prewrath rapture cannot be the teaching of scripture because the Day of the Lord is only 12 or 24 hours long and therefore cannot extend through the trumpets and the bowls of Revelation. Here is a short defense of the “Day of the Lord as a span of time” position by Ron Wallace of Bible Fragrances and co-moderator of the Prewrath Only Discussion Group:

The argument that the Day of the Lord spans a period of time, rather than being 12 or 24 hours long, is based, in part, on Zechariah 14:6,7: “On that day there will be no light, no cold or frost. It will be a unique day, without daytime or nighttime-a day known to the LORD. When evening comes, there will be light.” This argument is also bolstered by the fact that the "day" of God's wrath is also called God's “year of redemption" (Isaiah 63:1-6) and “a year of recompense for the cause of Zion" (Isaiah 34:1-10). Moreover, there are just too many events that have to occur for it to be merely a day.

Not to add fuel to the fire, but the Zechariah 14;6,7 argument revolves, not just around the use of the word "day" to describe the Day of the Lord, but the fact that it is framed by "evening and morning," creating the sense -- when this scripture is viewed in isolation, from an Anglo-Saxon, 20th Century perspective -- that it is referring to a 12-hour day.

But as I think most of us know, the word "day," or the Hebrew "yom," can have many meanings, including a long period of time. In Zechariah 14, the difficulty for “span of time” adherents is that the writer uses the references of evening and morning. The same problem arises in Genesis 1, creating the impression among some that the Earth was created in seven 24-hour periods.

The resolution of both verses is the same. There is more than one creation account in the scriptures. I believe there are 10 or 11 of them all told (including those in the Psalms), and when we take them together, it becomes clear that the 24-hour day interpretation is not the most satisfactory. So here in Zechariah, where we have another example of the use of the word "day" (yom), framed by evening and morning, and yet it does not mean a 12-hour day.

My discussions with others on this subject have indicated that the use of the phrase "evening and morning," like the word "day," have multiple meanings in ancient Hebrew. In some contexts, such as those here, they serve as literary constructions to create a sense of completeness. For example, in Genesis 1, the seventh day has a morning but no evening. Why? Because we are still in the seventh day. It will not have its "evening" until the Messiah sits upon the throne of David.

There is such a delicate balance between taking the Bible literally to the greatest extent possible and understanding the culture, literary constructions, and customs of the times. Such things can make things difficult for us English-speaking, 20th century myopics!




RESPONSES TO READER QUESTIONS:

Q:
A pastor friend of mine from Cuba visited last December and returned with your book and Van Kampen's short version explanation of prewrath. He says he has been a pretribber all his life but sees some in consistencies in it. All says that "pre-ira" has good points, but he is not totally convinced yet. He has two questions:

1. From a prewrath position, how can you best explain the following verse from Revelation 11:1? “And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein.” Does it have to do with the end of the Gentiles' rule ? Why the need to measure the temple with a reed? [face value interpretation vs. metaphor ?]

2. Where can we place the two witnesses? Before the first half or after the second half of Daniel's 70th week?

A: Your friend is a pretribber, right? Ask him what this has to do with prewrath. How does this impact a prewrath vs. pretrib discussion? I'm not sure how to answer him because I'm not sure what he's getting at here. I don't see the relevance to the debate.

As far as I know, prewrath and pretrib hold the same view regarding the temple. Both hold that the trodding underfoot of the Gentiles coincides with the Antichrist's committing of the Abomination of Desolation at the midpoint of the 70th Week. The desecration of the temple by “treading” is then brought to an end at the conclusion of the 70th Week. Unless there are some unusual interpretations that I am not aware of, both pretrib and prewrath hold the same view on this.

As for the reed, I'm assuming that this is an ancient measuring technique. I'm just guessing, but from the reeds along waterways that I've seen, they all grow to exactly the same height - about three feet. So my guess is that, in ancient Israel, reeds were used as a measuring tool out of convenience. A good Bible dictionary or commentary should answer this question fairly easily.

Now, for the placement of the two witnesses. Prewrath holds that the witnesses appear at the midpoint of the 70th Week, coinciding with the appearance of the Antichrist. At the time that God allows the appearance of the ungodly Antichrist, He also brings about the appearance of a godly counterpart-the witnesses. God may allow evil, but He always balances it with righteousness, so at the same time that the AC is given authority, it makes sense that the witnesses appear, too.

Also, we read about the witnesses' return to life at the same time that the "kingdoms of this world have become those of His Christ," at the end of the 70th Week. so if the end of their ministry is at the end of the 70th Week, then the beginning of their ministry is at the midpoint.


Q. Hello from Georgia (just outside of Savannah). I have been at this church for eight years. What book could you recommend that serves as a commentary on the book of Revelation from the prewrath standpoint? Also, where can I find information on the stance of church history in regards to the timing of the rapture? I have read that we have 1800 years of church history on our side in regards to believing the Church will go through some portion of the Tribulation. Which church fathers wrote on this and is pre-trib mentioned anywhere in church history before 1830's? Thanks so much and for all you do!

A. I would recommend Don Salerno's Revelation Unsealed. I've only had a chance to read the first few chapters, but it was excellent, and all of the reviews I've heard from other prewrathers indicate that it is a solid, very useful volume. Salerno is also a member of the prewrath discussion group, in and out. (For a full review of this book, as well as Strong Tower Publishing reviews of other prophecy titles, visit www.strongtowerpublishing.com/bookreviews.htm.)

As for church history, the challenge is that, until the last century, we didn't really have names for the various positions. The writers simply wrote what they believed, and it wasn't until the 1900s that the views really congealed into coherent, well-argued positions. Thus, it's very difficult to really nail down who believed what when. The writings of the church fathers, for example, weren't defenses but rather usually secondary illustrations to a larger point. Therefore, their discusses of the end times would fit the historicist or posttrib views as well as they do prewrath.

Unless someone recently has sat down to objectively outline the history of the rapture positions, I think it's been up to the rest of us to sort through the best we can. The closest I've seen is Gary Vaterlaus' history of amillennialism in Sola Scriptura magazine [no longer published], which I pulled from to create a brief history of the rapture views in Before God's Wrath. But it is only a short history framed as a way to provide insight into how pretrib could have taken hold at the time that it did. It is not intended to be comprehensive.

Sorry I can't help on this one, but unless someone has written a text that I'm not aware of, this one is still up for grabs.


Q: I have a question about the resurrection. If both pre-trib and pre-wrath believe in a rapture that occurs prior to the Lord coming back to establish His throne, how do you account for Revelation 20:4-6 where the "first" resurrection is mentioned? If there is a resurrection of the dead that precedes the living at the rapture, and then if there is a resurrection of all those who died during the great tribulation (or after the rapture), that would be a double resurrection. And the Revelation 20:4-6 clearly says that those who come through the great tribulation were part of the "first" resurrection.

The Bible clearly does not teach a two-part resurrection. Can you help with this?

A: This is a problematic verse for prewrath, there is no doubt about it. Some believe that the first resurrection occurs in stages - with Jesus being the first, then those who were resurrected immediately after His resurrection in the first century, then those at the rapture, and then those after Armageddon. Another possibility is that, since the Great Tribulation is ended just before the rapture (Matt. 24:22, 29), and God's wrath will not be poured out upon believers during the Day of the Lord, there are no believers who will die during the DOL. Thus, no further resurrection of the just is necessary.

Posttrib ties this up nicely, with a single resurrection after the DOL. However, posttrib requires an overlap of the seals, trumpets, and bowls, to make Rev. 6:12-13 occur at Armageddon, and since there are so many textual indicators within Revelation that seem to point strongly to the consecutive nature of these events, I can't make the timing work out. There are those in the posttrib camp who feel that they can do this based on similarities between events. I see this as subjective and not strong enough evidence to override what I believe to be strong internal textual evidence to their consecutive nature.

Therefore, despite how neatly posttrib ties up the "first resurrection," I can't justify abandoning a prewrath position based on this verse. Whatever problems Rev. 20:4 may create, I have adopted a position of grace and humility that perhaps I am wrong, or perhaps posttrib is wrong, or perhaps we are all wrong, and things will not work out exactly as we all think they will.


INVENTORY REDUCTION SALE:
“THE HOPE OF CHRIST'S SECOND COMING”

Due to changes recently made by Strong Tower Publishing's printer, we are now moving to a zero-inventory model (all books are printed as they are ordered and shipped directly from the printer). Some books, such as Before God's Wrath, are already at zero inventory. To clean off the rest of the shelves, we are offering a 30% discount on remaining titles, including:

Who Will Be Left Behind and When?
http://www.strongtowerpublishing.com/leftbehind.htm

Prophecy's Architecture: How to Build an End-Times Doctrine
http://www.strongtowerpublishing.com/architecture.htm

Touching the Soul, a book of poetry by prewrath pastor R. g. Wallace
http://www.strongtowerpublishing.com/touchingsoul.htm

Antes de la Ira de Dios, the Spanish translation of “Before God's Wrath”
http://www.strongtowerpublishing.com/before-spanish.htm

The Hope of Christ's Second Coming: How Is It Taught in Scripture and Why? (19th century classic by Samuel P. Tregelles)
http://www.strongtowerpublishing.com/Hope_Christ_Coming.htm

This discount will not be reflected on the Strong Tower Publishing website and the number of copies is limited. If you would like to take advantage of this offer, please contact Strong Tower Publishing directly at strongtowerpubs@aol.com to reserve your copies and make shipping and payment arrangements.
 

Back to Newsletter Archive

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Free counters provided by Andale.